260919

260918

260917

260916

260915

• 2.3: sharpness
• 2.4: reductios

260914

• 2.1: def / generality
• 2.2: instr
• 2.3: sharpness
• 2.4: reductios

Facoltà teologica dell'italia centrale.

260913

• RH, GGV: args
• 2.1: def / generality
• 2.2: instr
• 2.3: sharpness
• 2.4: reductios

Naively underestimated rigors of travel.

260912

• 2.1: def / generality
• 2.2: instr
• 2.3: sharpness
• 2.4: reductios

NK took seven hours. So the day felt spent by 17U.

260911

• 2.1: def / generality
• 2.2: instr

1: Innb. Actual start: 16h. Clarified structure; production ramp up tomorrow.

260906

• IK Ja L
• Fs spotty facs - 1.3 psychoutbs, uncharitability

260905

• IK Ja L
• Fs spotty facs - 1.3 psychoutbs, uncharitability

Deceleration starting 260903: correspondence to K made me especially anxious; same goes for correspondence to H until it was settled.

260904

• list top 3.1
• mue re `discovery' no syll for euc
• IK Ja L
• Fs spotty facs - 1.3 psychoutbs, uncharitability

260903

• organization of 3
• 11.1 on logtrad1

260902

• 1.2 must cohere: induction F and C, G-JSM connection
• 1.2 K: summary adequate?
• 1.3 rev C, La BS on history
• organization of 3
• why cant Bobz BS?
• Koehn metho vs lndr
• mue obj 1.2
• objs 1.1-1.4
• 2.1-2.2 presentable
• bib
• spell check

260901

• 1.2 Sch Weh Brief: ref to K?
• 1.3 Spursich
• 1.2 must cohere: induction F and C, G-JSM connection
• 1.2 K: summary adequate?
• 1.3 rev C, La BS on history
• organization of 3
• do F misreps of M,E,H have some pattern?
• why cant Bobz BS
• objs 1.1
• objs 1.2

260816

• GF
  • o2-2.1.1-2.1.5
  • o1-2.2
  • o2-1.1-1.3
• P,R

wh swar, FAZ, sw, HM, WS, `manifest image'?

260807

• GF
  • o2-2.1.1-2.1.5
  • o1-2.2
  • o2-1.1-1.3
• P,R

260806

• GF
  • o2-2.1
  • o1-2.2
  • o2-1.1-1.3
• P,R

260805

• GF
  • o2-2.1
  • o1-2.2
  • o2-1.1-1.3
• P,R

260804

• GF
  • o2-2.1
  • o1-2.2
  • o2-1.1-1.3
• P,R

Arguments fall into place; I spend all the time dealing with the details of my own excruciating style. The child is ghostly and yet too corpulent for the canal. The conclusion: get the bones out first.

260803

• GF
  • o2-2.1
  • o1-2.2
  • o2-1.1-1.3
• P,R

260802

• GF
  • o2-2.1
  • o1-2.2
  • o2-1.1-1.3
• P,R

260801

• GF
  • o - instruments
  • o - vagueness
• Thompson
  • upshots for F-ean?
• P,R

260731

• GF
  • o - instruments
• agents
  • P:R.
  • visual verbs
  • Thompson
    • upshots for F-ean?
    • o: log vs emp `thoughts'
    • get through 6
• esp. P,R: conditionals, subjunctive

260730

• GF
  • o - instruments
• agents
  • P: R.369d-370c
  • visual verbs
  • locii in sbs
  • rev: forms
  • Thompson
    • o: log vs emp `thoughts'
    • get through 6
• esp. P,R: conditionals, subjunctive

260729

• GF
  • o - instruments
  • o - vagueness
  • o - reductios
• agents (causal locii)
  • P: R.369d-370c
  • logw=theorie / visual verbs
  • rev: forms
  • Thompson:re-o Organisation, Operation, Process
• esp. P,R: indagaremos, etc. + queréis

Read further along in T; T sets desiderata for GF: does failure of AP arguments set constraints on F-ean methods? Repurposed side-by-side, which wasn't on list.

260728

• GF
  • o - instruments
  • o - vagueness
  • o - reductios
• agents (causal locii)
  • P: R.369
  • `needs'?
  • Thompson: task-subtask
• esp. P,R Auflistung

260727

• GF
  • o - reductios
  • o - instruments
  • o - vague
• agents

Hung up on Plat. R. 369 and Macbeth 2005. Mechanization-division of labor as guiding comparison

260726

• GF
  • o - reductios
  • o - instruments
  • o - vague
• RWE
  look at natessay
  • o - am sch sec on nat
• GGM